For Germany, the criticism of religion has been largely completed, and the criticism of religion is the prerequisite of all criticism.
The profane existence of error is compromised as soon as its heavenly
oratio pro aris et focis , ["speech for the altars and hearths"] has been
refuted. Man, who has found only the reflection of himself in the
fantastic reality of heaven, where he sought a supernatural being, will no longer
be tempted to find the mere appearance of himself, a non-human being
["Unmensch"], where he seeks and must seek his true reality.
The foundation of irreligious criticism is this: Man makes religion, religion
does not make man. Religion is indeed man's self-consciousness and self-awareness so long as he has not found himself or has already lost himself
again. But, man is no abstract being squatting outside the world.
Man is the world of man -- state, society. This state and this
society produce religion, which is an inverted consciousness of the
world, because they are an inverted world. Religion is the general
theory of this world, its encyclopaedic compendium, its logic in popular
form, its spiritual point d'honneur, it enthusiasm, its moral sanction,
its solemn complement, and its universal basis of consolation and
justification. It is the fantastic realization of the human essence
since the human essence has not acquired any true reality. The struggle
against religion is, therefore, indirectly the struggle against that
world whose spiritual aroma is religion.
Religious suffering is, at one and the same time, the expression of real
suffering and a protest against real suffering. Religion is the sigh of
the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, and the soul of
soulless conditions. It is the opium of the people.
The abolition of religion as the illusory happiness of the people is
the demand for their real happiness. To call on them to give up their
illusions about their condition is to call on them to give up a
condition that requires illusions. The criticism of religion is,
therefore, in embryo, the criticism of that vale of tears of which
religion is the halo.
Criticism has plucked the imaginary flowers on the chain not in order
that man shall continue to bear that chain without fantasy or
consolation, but so that he shall throw off the chain and pluck the
living flower. The criticism of religion disillusions man, so that he
will think, act, and fashion his reality like a man who has discarded
his illusions and regained his senses, so that he will move around
himself as his own true Sun. Religion is only the illusory Sun which
revolves around man as long as he does not revolve around himself.
It is, therefore, the task of history, once the other-world of truth has
vanished, to establish the truth of this world. It is the immediate
task of philosophy, which is in the service of history, to unmask
self-estrangement in its unholy forms once the holy form of human
self-estrangement has been unmasked. Thus, the criticism of Heaven
turns into the criticism of Earth, the criticism of religion into the
criticism of law, and the criticism of theology into the criticism of
The following exposition [a full-scale critical study of Hegel's
Philosophy of Right was supposed to follow this introduction] -- a
contribution to this undertaking -- concerns itself not directly with
the original but with a copy, with the German philosophy of the state
and of law. The only reason for this is that it is concerned with
It is clear that the arm of criticism cannot replace the criticism of arms. Material force can only be overthrown by material force; but theory
also becomes a material force as soon as it has gripped the masses.
Theory is capable of gripping the masses as soon as it demonstrates ad
hominem, and it demonstrates ad hominem as soon as it becomes radical.
To be radical is to grasp the root of the matter. But, for man, the
root is man himself. The evident proof of the radicalism of German
theory, and hence of its practical energy, is that is proceeds from a
resolute positive abolition of religion. The criticism of religion ends
with the teaching that man is the highest essence for man -- hence, with
the categoric imperative to overthrow all relations in which man is a
debased, enslaved, abandoned, despicable essence, relations which cannot
be better described than by the cry of a Frenchman when it was planned
to introduce a tax on dogs: Poor dogs! They want to treat you as human
Even historically, theoretical emancipation has specific practical
significance for Germany. For Germany's revolutionary past is
theoretical, it is the Reformation. As the revolution then began in the
brain of the monk, so now it begins in the brain of the philosopher.
Luther, we grant, overcame bondage out of devotion by replacing it by
bondage out of conviction. He shattered faith in authority because he
restored the authority of faith. He turned priests into laymen because
he turned laymen into priests. He freed man from outer religiosity
because he made religiosity the inner man. He freed the body from
chains because he enchained the heart.
But, if Protestantism was not the true solution of the problem, it was at least the true setting of it. It was no longer a case of the layman's struggle against the priest outside himself but of his struggle against his own priest inside himself, his priestly nature. And if the Protestant transformation of the German layman into priests emancipated the lay popes, the princes, with the whole of their priestly clique, the privileged and philistines, the philosophical transformation of priestly Germans into men will emancipate the people. But, secularization will not stop at the confiscation of church estates set in motion mainly by hypocritical Prussia any more than emancipation stops at princes. The Peasant War, the most radical fact of German history, came to grief because of theology. Today, when theology itself has come to grief, the most unfree fact of German history, our status quo, will be shattered against philosophy.
Where, then, is the real possibility of a German emancipation?
Answer: In the formulation of a class with radical chains, a class of
civil society which is not a class of civil society, an estate which is
the dissolution of all estates, a sphere which has a universal character
by its universal suffering and claims no particular right because no
particular wrong, but wrong generally, is perpetuated against it; which
can invoke no historical, but only human, title; which does not stand in
any one-sided antithesis to the consequences but in all-round antithesis
to the premises of German statehood; a sphere, finally, which cannot
emancipate itself without emancipating itself from all other spheres of
society and thereby emancipating all other spheres of society, which, in
a word, is the complete loss of man and hence can win itself only
through the complete re-winning of man. This dissolution of society as
a particular estate is the proletariat.
The proletariat is beginning to appear in Germany as a result of the
rising industrial movement. For, it is not the naturally arising poor
but the artificially impoverished, not the human masses mechanically
oppressed by the gravity of society, but the masses resulting from the
drastic dissolution of society, mainly of the middle estate, that form
the proletariat, although, as is easily understood, the naturally
arising poor and the Christian-Germanic serfs gradually join its ranks.
By heralding the dissolution of the hereto existing world order, the
proletariat merely proclaims the secret of its own existence, for it is
the factual dissolution of that world order. By demanding the negation
of private property, the proletariat merely raises to the rank of a
principle of society what society has raised to the rank of its
principle, what is already incorporated in it as the negative result
of society without its own participation. The proletarian then finds
himself possessing the same right in regard to the world which is coming
into being as the German king in regard to the world which has come into
being when he calls the people hispeople, as he calls the horse his
horse. By declaring the people his private property, the king merely
proclaims that the private owner is king.
As philosophy finds its material weapon in the proletariat, so the
proletariat finds its spiritual weapon in philosophy. And once the
lightning of thought has squarely struck this ingenuous soil of the
people, the emancipation of the Germans into men will be accomplished.
Let us sum up the result:
The only liberation of Germany which is practically possible is
liberation from the point of view of that theory which declares man to
be the supreme being for man. German can emancipate itself from the
Middle Ages only if it emancipates itself at the same time from the
partial victories over the Middle Ages. In Germany, no form of
bondage can be broken without breaking all forms of bondage. Germany,
which is renowned for its thoroughness, cannot make a revolution unless
it is a thorough one. The emancipation of the German will be the
emancipation of man. Philosophy is the head of this emancipation, and the proletariat is its heart. Philosophy can only be realized by the abolition of the proletariat, and the proletariat can only by abolished by the realization of philosophy.