ANTH 112.20 Introduction to Socio-Cultural Anthropology
Winter 2018
Jan. 23, 25: What is the role of theory in anthropology?
READ: Course notes: Overview of Anthropological Theory
Schiller, pp. 27-38
From last time: Nathan
- what do you think of her project, her methods, the ethics of her
research, and the results she discusses here?
Research
questions, such as those pursued in the research projects we explored
in the section on methodology, are generated through theoretical
frameworks.
- theory tells us what is important, and how those important features are linked
- since no one can study everything about a
society, and since all of us already make choices about what we see as
important, theory provides a consistent frameworks to select and
analyse information
What are/have been the major anthropological
theories and how might one use these theories to generate research
questions and analyse anthropological information?
- Classical nineteenth century evolutionary theory (up to about
the 1920s, although subsequent theories sometimes reflected similar
assumptions; Tylor, Frazer, Morgan)
- says all societies go through the same sequence of stages
(“savagery” [divided into lower, middle and upper stages]; “barbarism”
” [divided into lower, middle and upper stages]; and “civilization”)
- Morgan’s version is a materialist approach
in that the focus is on real things and how people relate to them (e.g.
“middle savagery” was based on the skill of fishing, with simple
monosyllabic language and a family form in which a group of brothers
married a group of sisters).
- deeply flawed in terms of racist assumptions, belief that there
was one line of evolutionary development
- Diffusionism (1890s-)
- technology and ideas invented once and spread out from where they were invented.
- idealist
- Historical particularism (Boas) - cultural relativism; each society a unique product of its past
- tends to be an idealist approach in that the
focus is on the way people think and on the full description of their
culture
- Functionalism ( 1890s-; Durkheim, Malinowski)
- focus on the social purpose of an aspect of
society; use an organic analogy that assumes social harmony and lack of
change
- social structuralist
- Structural functionalism (1930s on; Radcliffe-Brown)
- interested in social structure as the most important feature of a society
- “structure” as a patterned system of social relations
- social structuralist
-Cultural ecology (1950s - ; Steward, Cohen)
- a neo-evolutionary multilineal framework
that focuses on the connections between the environment, the technology
and the socio-political organization of a society;
- provided much of our understanding of
categories such as “bands,” “tribes,” “chiefdoms,” and “states” (in
political anthropology) and “foragers,” “horticulturalists,”
“pastoralists,” “intensive cultivators,” and “industrial society” (in
economic anthropology)
- materialist
- Marxist and neo-Marxist approaches: (in anthropology, especially from 1960s on)
- focus is on way in which people are involved
in relationships to produce items (social relations of production);
- Class is a central concept
- materialist
- Performance/Interactionism (1960s on; Goffman)
- focus is on how people perform a role in face-to-face interactions
- impression management
- front stage/back stage
- stigma (visible/invisible; discredit/discreditable)
- Schiller uses this
- Theory of Practice (1980s on; Bourdieu)
- what behaviours and understandings do people
develop from lived experience? Are there different behaviours and
understandings for different groups in a society? How do the behaviours
relate to the political structure of the society?
- tends to idealist in focus on behaviour, but based on material relations
- Post modern anthropology:
- diverse forms, but tend to reject the idea
that there is a single theoretical perspective that can explain
everything.
- usually tend to be idealist
next